Every year, Apple is releasing a new iPhone that is releasing a new processor. We have been accustomed to the superiority of Apple’s processors on the processors of competitors and with great differences, although the competitors are using Qualcomm processors, which is one of the largest companies with resources to enable them to develop excellent processors also, Although it is not a company specialized in the manufacture of processors?
Look at the Apple processors and A11 Bionic
Apple offers 64-bit processors using the basic ARM design, but one of the differences between Apple and other companies is that Apple has an ARM license that allows it to design its processors completely from scratch and use architecture without complying with the original processor design from the parent. The A11 processor has six nuclei where there are two high-performance and four “high efficiency” outputs that are energy-efficient and used for conditions where the device does not require strong performance. The A10 processor has a fairly similar build, but the difference is that the A11 processor is capable of Use the six nuclei together to get more power than last year’s processor, which can only use faster nuclei or energy-efficient nuclei. Finally, the new Apple processor has a 10-nanometer transistor design and is shared by the newer Snape Dragon in this and many other things, Kernel performance The individual in Apple’s latest processor is more than twice the performance of the Snape Dragon processor.
Introduction of Apple
In 2013, Apple released the iPhone 5s, which was the first device to carry a 64-bit processor on the market, but it was surprising that Apple was not the first to introduce it in a phone, but first to complete the processor. The first processor was released after the 64-bit technology and of course had to Snap Dragon to catch up the following year so tried to make the same architecture in a hurry because the wait was meant to get out of the competition completely and a huge difference, and with the years until today was Snab Dragon oscillating between its own designs And ARM designs, while Apple already had its core design and remained It has been developed steadily for generations and Snape Dragon is trying to catch up with them in various ways, but it is still in the back.
We also know that Apple has an important competitive advantage and it does everything it has in the sense that Apple is designing the phone and decide what to put it and design the processor specifically for him and even the system is specifically designed for Apple devices and processors and this may provide Apple’s weeks of development may need other companies and also gives Apple The ability to control exactly what you want the processor to do, but other companies such as Snape Dragon and ARM are making the processors for sale to a large audience of companies, they may use processors in smart phones, perhaps in tablets, perhaps in a TV or even a smart refrigerator. All this means that the processor is not designed for a particular phone or even for phones only. They also manufacture full lines of processors for different purposes and therefore can not focus on the work of a single processor such as Apple Its work is developing only one processor that is used in one machine.
More silicon, better speed
This is also due to the work of Apple on one product, you find that the size of Apple processor actually is twice the size of any other processor of the Snape Dragon. This means that Apple is putting more and more silicon into processors. Do you ask why other companies do not? The answer lies in money, silicon is not cheap, it is so expensive that some small processors manufacturing companies can have a difference between profit and loss has to add or remove half a million square meters of silicon. So let’s look at the status of Android processors, often starting the basic design at ARM, which completes the design and send it to Qualcomm, which has to modify it to fit the vision and add what you want to manufacture and then send it to Samsung, for example, which should put them in phones and sell. We find that each of these grades increase the price and we have many companies that have research plans and institutions and employees and spending and each company must profit from the same processor so find that the reduction in the use of silicon is an ideal solution, but in the case of Apple, the processor is designed entirely and for its device it can put money where you want, for example the company spend on the processor and reduce spending on other parts of the phone such as some semiconductors or panels or sensors or parts of the screen, Apple has full control over how to spend on phone manufacturing.
Hope so, you will get some idea of why apple chips or processors are faster and efficient than other processors like Qualcomm processors.